Here's a note from my brother about this new book from JHU:
(the link contains the first chapter or so of "Information Ages" by Michael Hobart.) Here are my brother's comments:i'm still not clear whether the author is full of shit or not, but he does challenge some of my strongly-held internal prejudices (such as the primacy of the idea of information), so i enjoyed reading his thoughts in the excerpt here. in particular, i thought you [trochee] might be interested in the ideas he's presenting about the fundamental change that literacy creates in the way we think about knowledge and communication, not just how we transmit it. just the other day i was asked "what era would you go back and live in if you could" and for some reason, i came up with "the dawn of writing" because i think that would be a fairly mind-blowing time (if you don't mind the fact that it tended to be mostly used for accounting purposes at first, anyway -- sort of like online-commerce today as opposed to general digital literacy which seems less developed). And then i stumble across this...
The ideas presented here are challenging (but wildly speculative) about the nature of how literacy affects what we believe about language.
no subject
Date: 2003-08-11 06:32 am (UTC)By the way, would you be interested in joining a group blog about language which
no subject
Date: 2003-08-11 07:04 am (UTC)I like how blogs allow some quick informal information-spreading -- Computational Linguistics is great, but it's kinda slow turnaround.
Sign me up; let me know what I have to do to get involveed.
no subject
Date: 2003-08-12 02:18 am (UTC)