trochee: (Default)
[personal profile] trochee
My younger, smarter brother points out the O'Reilly poster documenting the family tree of programming languages.

I think it's interesting to compare it to the family trees of Indo-European languages -- it's a very different shape, natch. There's lots more cross-fertilization in programming than in natural language. Of course, one has to wonder how much of the cross-fertilization in [human] language change goes ignored in plots like these approximations of language histories.

Another nice feature of the O'Reilly poster is that it shows the duration of various [programming] languages -- most of the old ones (Forth, anybody?) have petered out, but O'Reilly shows the sheer persistence (for example) of C. Some family trees of programming languages don't do this nearly as well, though to be fair that's not necessarily what they set out to do.

Date: 2004-06-17 11:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xaosenkosmos.livejournal.com
From "Some": Sather looks, uh, interesting. Incoming arrows from Modula-3, Eiffel, Pascal, Smalltalk-80, C++, ObjC, and CLOS (which has an indirect arrow from Lisp).

My poor little brain just can't wrap itself around that prospect.

I can't help but snicker at the fact that there are about four language families: Basic, APL, ML, and the rest. Especially since "the rest" seems to culminate in C# =)

Profile

trochee: (Default)
trochee

June 2016

S M T W T F S
   1234
567 89 1011
12131415 161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 31st, 2025 02:21 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios